Home Blog Page 20

Miami Book Cafe That Banned Black Conservative Closes Its Final Chapter on Bigoted Business

The book has been closed on a North Miami café  that banned Fox News political analyst Gianno Caldwell for his conservative beliefs.

That black conservative pundit, Gianno Caldwell, was eating breakfast with friends when he was asked to leave the book café in January 2023, according to the Miami News Times.

The conservative pundit spoke out about the event on Fox & Friends Weekend and Twitter, claiming that his group was discussing what it was like “working over at Fox News,” their “values,” “violent crime” and “progressive [district attorneys]” before being shown the exit.

“I can’t believe what just happened,” Caldwell wrote on Twitter after the incident. “I met up with friends for breakfast at Paradis Books and Bread in North Miami & while we were having discussions about politics we were told by the owners that we were not welcomed there because we aren’t politically aligned. Outrageous.”

Paradis Books & Bread said that it had ejected Caldwell and his pals from their company for a “zero-tolerance policy” for opposing political beliefs. The book café owners related that one of Caldwell’s group members reacted with, “That is your business model, and I respect that,” before leaving.

The Miami-based book café said that its booting of a black conservative and his friends led to a backlash on social media.

“Since the incident, we have been getting harassed on the internet, specifically on t*itter, google reviews, and… on this platform,” Paradis Books & Bread wrote on Instagram at the time.

According to its last statement on the company’s website, Paradis Books & Bread gave a half-baked reason for shutting its doors.

We have made the heavy decision not to reopen paradis, and this is our way of letting you know why. We’ve come to the end of the line, and we’re ending this project on our own terms. To our haters, we suppose congratulations are in order, so you can go ahead and stop reading now! But, to those who have loved us, supported our many changes, laughed with us, danced with us, and maybe even cried with us, we wanted to give you this parting explanation, as well as a wholehearted thank you.

The Paradis book café proceeded to render its last chapter before filing for Chapter 11.

The explanation for our closing truly isn’t just one reason, or one problem that we can point to and blame; it is a whole tangled knot of things, issues that both stand alone and compound one another, ultimately making this project unsustainable for us. Some of the main reasons that we need to close are deeply personal, and they’re the most important ones insofar as paradis is, afterall, a very personal project. Paradis has always been an owner-operated business, and, while we were once a team of five, we’ve been a team of just three for quite some time now. Making this place run when there were five of us was always challenging and emotional, as bringing different personalities and work ethics together towards one goal can be. The gradual disintegration of our team brought up a lot of difficult conversations, compromises, and, ultimately, the singular heartbreak of long-held friendships ending. While we have had various friends work part-time at paradis helping us push through busy service nights and “volunteering” during our parties, everything else has landed in our laps. It was never our intention to hire a different team of people, nor has it been ultimately sustainable, because what paradis has always required was an equal sharing of responsibilities, both during service and when the doors are closed.

The café makes it abundantly clear that its vision was one of a socialist salon.

Paradis, on its very best day, has been an experiment towards an otherwise. An experiment in connection, in “speaking our thoughts into being,” in hope, in rage, in love. In a society such as ours, it is a constant fight to be connected, to be supported, to live. Any project that attempts towards an otherwise is indeed a hard-fought experiment, and we have to keep fighting and attempting and tweaking and failing and trying again. Paradis, like other political spaces before it, are projects that often don’t last forever. They squeeze themselves uncomfortably into the vestments of a business model until the seams eventually burst. They’re often deeply personal spaces, and when those persons or personal circumstances change, the space and the project must transform with them. Interdependence and care are incredibly difficult things to instill into a business model, but we’ve tried our best to do just that. If this place has truly touched you, it’s likely these tenets were reaching out to pull you in. As many of you who have been conspiring with us at paradis over the years already are and have been, we urge us all to continue to reorient ourselves purposefully and lovingly to the world and to commit to others, to question, to study. It’s ok that it’s ending, ok that it failed, because failure is momentary, clarifying, and fortifying. The heart of paradis, the intent, the ideas of it, remain always. It is a building, and not. It is, moreso, a community of people who have come and gone and come back again, revolutionary ideas and intentions and attempts that never end.

Vive la révolution! Well, not really.

NOW READ:

New Survey Places Biden Among Greatest Presidents of All-Time, Ranks Donald Trump Dead Last

New Survey Places Biden Among Greatest Presidents of All-Time, Ranks Donald Trump Dead Last

In another indication of the partisan bent of modern academia, a recent survey of scholars on the American presidency, performed at two U.S. universities and subsequently published, is gaining attention for its questionable and controversial results.

The 2024 Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey, led by Brandon Rottinghaus of the University of Houston and Justin S. Vaughn of Coastal Carolina University, surveyed experts at the American Political Science Association, as well as scholars who had recently published peer-reviewed academic research on the U.S. presidency.

The survey has current President Joe Biden as the 14th greatest president in American history. His predecessor, President Donald J. Trump, is ranked dead last.

Biden was ranked ahead of Woodrow Wilson, Ronald Reagan, and Ulysses S. Grant. Former President Barack Obama was placed seventh, up eight points from last year’s survey.

Trump scored the survey’s lowest ranking of 45, trailing James Buchanan at 44th, Andrew Johnson at 43rd, Franklin Pierce at 42nd, and William Henry Harrison at 41st.

Abraham Lincoln was selected by the scholars as America’s best president.

The poll also ranked respondents’ party and ideological differences, but the surveyors claimed it did not “tend to make a major difference overall.”

However, there was a clear party divide in the ranks for Obama and Biden, with Democrats putting them 6th and 13th on average, while Republicans placed them 15th and 30th, respectively.

The presidential rankings are notable for their lack of objective measurement for Americans’ quality of life under a given president, and appear to be ranked according to how a president’s ideological disposition matches those of typically left-wing political scholars.

The Biden presidency and the Trump presidency represent a major political litmus test for the ability of scholars to assess elected leaders based on objective merits.

Donald Trump’s economy, up until the moment state governors began locking down under the Covid pandemic, was one of the best in modern history.

As Atlantic scholar Derek Thompson summarized in August 2019:

  • Jobs have grown for 106 consecutive months, the longest streak on record.
  • At 121 months, this is the longest bull market in American history.
  • The unemployment rate has been at 4 percent or less for 16 consecutive months, the longest such streak in 50 years.
  • Inequality remains a crucial problem, but wages are now growing the fastest among the lowest-wage industries, thanks to state-by-state increases in the minimum wage and the effects of low unemployment.
  • The University of Michigan’s consumer-sentiment index, which peaked at 112 in 1999, has hovered above 90 for more than four years, something that hasn’t happened since the 1990s.
  • Latino unemployment has fallen to its lowest rate on record.
  • Black unemployment, too, has fallen to its lowest rate on record, and, as the investor and Bloomberg columnist Conor Sen points out, the unemployment rate for black teenagers, which peaked at 48.9 percent in 2010, has plunged to yet another record low in 2019.

The United States was also kept out of foreign wars, which were sparse on Donald Trump’s watch. The Trump presidency brokered peace deals in the Middle East and successfully promoted deterrence through a ‘peace through strength’ approach.

In addition, the 45th president secured the southern border, preventing the human catastrophe and widespread national disruption of a full-blown border crisis.

The Biden presidency has witnessed a massive spike in inflation, a surge in energy prices, rampant spending fraught with waste and corruption, reckless brinksmanship and foreign interventionism, and a border crisis that has exploded out-of-control.

Biden’s presidency has been one of the most chaotic and controversial in American history.

  • The Department of Justice on his watch has politically prosecuted a former president, raising major questions about corrupt weaponization of the agency.
  • Biden’s family has been thoroughly exposed as having participated in multiple foreign influence peddling schemes with the aiding and abetting of Joe Biden.
  • His administration has pursued unconstitutional censorship and surveillance of the American people.

It has been a disaster for the rule of law and for the social contract with the federal government as stipulated by the U.S. Constitution.

The quality of life for the vast majority of Americans was much better under the Trump presidency than the Biden presidency. The Trump presidency gets zero credit from scholars for it, while they give Joe Biden maximum credit for simply being a Democratic president.

Academia is broken. This presidential survey is yet another example of how modern scholars are completely out-of-touch with the interests of the American people.

NOW READ:

‘Gangsta’ Mayor Accused of Weaponizing Police, Shutting Down Businesses If They Don’t Contribute to Her Campaign

Donald Trump Gets Behind Growing ‘Truckers for Trump’ Movement Boycotting Shipments to NYC

Truck drivers who support former President Trump have stated that they would not be going to New York City to demonstrate their dissatisfaction with the civil fraud verdict that penalized Trump more than $350 million last week.

This is in response to Trump being forbidden from conducting business in New York for three years and being held responsible for more than $350 million in damages in a civil fraud lawsuit filed against him, his family, and the Trump Organization by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

New York Judge Arthur Engoron issued his decision Friday, following a months-long trial that began in October and arose from James’ complaint accusing the former president of misrepresenting his assets and committing fraud.

As a result, many pro-Trump truck drivers around the country have taken the verdict seriously.

“I’m just one of the many millions of Truckers who believe in God and love this Country,” Chicago Ray wrote on X. “I stand with Trump bc Trump stands with me. Truckers for Trump ain’t just a slogan, it’s real.”

Chicago Ray called on fellow truckers to boycott taking shipments to New York City.

“I’ve been on the radio talking to drivers for about the past hour, and I’ve talked to about 10 drivers,” Ray wrote. “I don’t know how far across the country this is or how many truckers are going to start denying loads going to New York City, but I’ll tell you what — you f— around and find out,” he said.

The truck driver argued that Trump needs to be left alone and that the New York City’s ruling against him “election interference.”

“Thank you for being a true Patriot! If all of us patriots stand up, we will make a difference. We have to push back against the ones trying to purposely destroy our country,” a user commented on the post.

“Great, I hope all truckers refuse to go to New York! Enough is enough and our actions matter,” another user wrote.

A trucker named Trucker Johnny also backed the NYC boycott.

Donald Trump threw his support behind the Trucker boycott.

“Such an honor to have so many Great Patriots on the side of FREEDOM!” Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social, celebrating the trucker campaign on Saturday night. “Joe Biden’s Unfair and Dangerous Weaponization of Law Enforcement is a serious threat to Democracy. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

A vlogger going by @PhilThatRemains explains why people should stop doing business with New York.

“The government doesn’t like my politics, so that means I am going to invest my money somewhere else,” Phil said. “The government attacking people and using the government to take their property will destroy a country. It is literally what destroyed Venezuela.”

NOW READ:

Supreme Court is About to Put ‘Stake in the Heart’ of Jack Smith’s Case Against Trump

‘Gangsta’ Mayor Accused of Weaponizing Police, Shutting Down Businesses If They Don’t Contribute to Her Campaign

Tiffany Henyard, the mayor of a small Illinois town, has always exuded a certain kind of swagger while in office.

But citizens now accuse the Thornton Township Supervisor and Dolton Mayor of crossing the line from looking like a gangster to acting like one.

“People look at politics like a joke, it’s like a mockery right now because of all this stuff,” Village of Dolton Trustee Kiana Belcher said at a public meeting. “She comes to board meetings dressed like Nino Brown.”

“During official meetings, Tiffany Henyard is seen dressed as the movie gangster Nino Brown from ‘New Jack City’,” reported Unlimited Ls on X.

“She even brought a DJ to play Rihanna’s ‘B***h Better Have My Money’,” the account noted. “One resident, Lawrence Gardner, claimed she forced the closure of his trucking business after he refused to renew a $3,500 contribution to her political fund.”

“I made the payment,” he said. “Then every year she started coming and required the same thing, and we had a problem about that.”

Gardner said that his failure to give out additional cash resulted in fraudulent claims of alcohol sales and the termination of his company license.

“What is she, Nino Brown?” he said. “Anything she wants done, she gets them to harass you. She likes nobody. If you are not doing what she say, if you are not doing how she’s saying to do it, you are a problem. She don’t like them.”

Former Dolton Mayor Riley Rogers, who lost to Henyard in 2021, expressed worry about town financed in addition to Heyward’s attitude. The community is now an estimated $6 million in debt.

“Some people take it as being glamorous by having a bunch of police officers around you and being escorted and being driven around,” Rogers said. “I never had a security detail as mayor.”

“I tried to stay away from the money,” he said. “It’s not your money so you can’t use it like it’s your piggy bank.”

Sherry Britton, 55, a village resident, expressed regret about her vote for Henyard.

“It was a vote that I regret,” she said. “Please put that in there! It was a vote that I regret deeply. When she got into office, she just shut everyone out and she went into the opposite direction. She became this tyrant and dictator.”

“It seems like her aspirations and goals are for her to be a reality star,” she said. “She didn’t [previously] wear all that make up. She just now thinks she’s this reality star. I don’t know this for sure but they say she is filming a reality show, because the cameras are always with her.”

Henyard has frequently defended herself by pointing out her race.

“You all should be ashamed of yourselves because you all are black. You all are black! And you all sitting up here beating and attacking a black woman that’s in power,” she said at a Feb. 5 meeting

A resident, whose name was not used by the New York Post, compared the community to Venezuela.

“It’s Venezuela. Isn’t that what they are doing out there with [President Nicolás] Maduro? His face is all over, like ‘I’m the dictator,’” a 66-year-old Dolton resident said.

“It’s like a dictator. There is no call for it. I’ve never seen a town that’s more screwed up under her, and I’ve seen 20 years of this malarkey. She’s … power-hungry. She doesn’t care how much she bleeds an area out of resources. It’s her life and that’s it,” the resident said.

Thornton Township residents have also accused Tiffany Henyard and other officials of shutting them out of public meetings, according to Fox 32.

“When I arrived there was security here,” said Stephanie Wiedeman, a former township employee . “He was standing at the bottom of the stairs preventing anybody from going up to the boardroom. I asked him if the meeting was downstairs, he replied yes.”

After being barred from entering the boardroom upstairs, the people were sent to the basement, where they were informed that the township board meeting would be place. It was not. They claim they requested a registration form for public feedback but never received it. And before they knew it, the four-minute meeting upstairs had ended, and Henyard had left without hearing from her constituents.

“They are violating our rights,” said Wiedeman. “I pay taxes here. I have a right to get up and speak whether this administration likes it or not.”

The New York Post reports accusations that Henyard has used the police to intimidate and harass her political enemies.

“She has come under scrutiny in recent weeks for a laundry list of antics, including accusations of blowing thousands in public funds on luxury travel and dining, turning local police into both her personal bodyguards and backup dancers for music videos, and hiring DJs for town meetings — all while the village falls $5 million into debt,” the Post notes.

“This town, the people have to watch. A lot of these people are scared because this police department is militaristic right now with her in it,” he said, declining to give his name to the Post over fears of retribution.

As reported by Ballotpedia, Tiffany Henyard, a Democrat, was elected in 2021. A recall to remove her in 2022 was unsuccessful because the findings that would have removed her were declared to be illegitimate.

NOW READ:

New Report: Joe Biden was ‘Central Element’ of Brother’s Foreign Influence-Peddling to Middle East

Supreme Court is About to Put ‘Stake in the Heart’ of Jack Smith’s Case Against Trump

The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to out a “stake in the heart” of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case against Donald Trump, according to respected legal experts.

Legal analyst Jeffrey Rosen, a law professor at George Washington University, told CNN on Saturday that if the Supreme Court finds in favor of the defendant, it will be a significant victory for President Trump and make things more difficult for the special counsel.

“There’s a centrally important case in the Supreme Court where the Court’s going to decide whether the core of Jack Smith’s charges involving obstruction of justice are consistent with Constitution and the law or not,” he told CNN. “If they throw those out, that’s going to be a stake in the heart of the Jack Smith case. It won’t prevent it, but it’ll make it much harder to pursue.”

Rosen also explained how the timing of Smith’s case against Trump could be disrupted.

“The Jack Smith timing depends on, first, what the Supreme Court does—is it going to rehear immunity or just uphold the D.C. circuit?” Rosen said. “But then next month there’s a centrally important case in the Supreme court where the court’s going to decide whether the core of Jack Smith’s charges involving obstruction of justice are consistent with the Constitution and the law or not.”

The CNN legal analyst also noted that if the Supreme Court justices “side with Fischer, it would also call into question the use of the law against other Jan. 6 defendants—including Trump.”

The case is called Joseph W. Fischer v. United States, and it pertains to the argued misapplication of 18 U.S.C. § 1512, obstruction of an official proceeding, to January 6 cases.

Fritz Ulrich, a lawyer for defendant Fischer, told Newsweek that he will “argue for a narrow construction of Section 1512(c)(2) consistent with its language and Congress’ expressed purpose in enacting it.”

“As far as the effect on the other January 6 cases that have a Section 1512(c)(2) count, nothing will happen at the argument that would affect them,” Ulrich said. “But we may be able to discern how some of the justices view the statutory language at issue.”

Earlier in February, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) joined 23 other senators in urging the Supreme Court to overturn the Biden administration’s legal tactic of utilizing the law to target Jan. 6 defendants, including Fischer.

“The Biden administration’s pursuit of its political opponents must be stopped,” the Arkansas Republican said in a statement. “Their strained interpretation of the law would criminalize vast swaths of everyday political conduct and violate the First Amendment—Congress never granted, and no administration should have the power to lock up political opponents for 20 years for merely trying to ‘influence’ Congress.”

Last Monday, the Supreme Court scheduled arguments for April 16 in the case involving Joseph Fischer, who was arrested on January 6, 2021.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on April 16 the a challenge to the Department of Justice’s interpretation of the “obstruction of an official proceeding” charge that both Fischer and President Trump are facing.

NOW HEAR:

New Report: Joe Biden was ‘Central Element’ of Brother’s Foreign Influence-Peddling to Middle East

New Report: Joe Biden was ‘Central Element’ of Brother’s Foreign Influence-Peddling to Middle East

It has been a constant refrain among defenders of President Joe Biden that his family benefiting from foreign influence-peddling abroad took place without his knowledge and participation.

A new report from Politico, as establishment a publication as one can find, shatters that already precarious defense.

While the president’s defenders have often pointed to Joe Biden’s involvement in the troubled affairs of his son Hunter Biden as illustrating a case of a father’s love, rather than the aiding and abetting of illicit activity that compromises national security, the new report involves a different and often-overlooked person in the Biden corruption scandal: The president’s brother, James Biden.

The Politico report comes ahead of an expected interview of James Biden on Feb. 21. The critical implication of the report is the “central” involvement of Joe Biden in his brother’s scheme to profit off a troubled medical conglomerate, now bankrupt, called Americore.

As the layers of activity that occurred in and around Americore are peeled back in a federal prosecution in Pennsylvania, a bankruptcy court in Kentucky, and tense witness interviews on Capitol Hill, a POLITICO investigation renders the most detailed picture to date of the ways in which Joe Biden’s relatives leveraged his public stature to advance a private business venture.

The investigation — based on public records, court filings, dozens of interviews and hundreds of exclusively obtained internal documents — reveals that Jim Biden’s role at Americore was larger than previously reported: In some internal documents and investor materials his name is included among its top handful of leaders. He also helped the company seal regulatory approval to acquire the Pennsylvania hospital and personally fired Americore’s chief financial officer, according to the emails obtained by POLITICO.

Documents obtained by Politico show that there was extensive participation by Joe Biden and his family’s inner circle in Americore, which is under federal investigation for allegedly fraudulent operations.

This Americore involvement included Jim Biden, his wife Sara, his son Jamie, Hunter Biden, and Joe Biden himself.

The investigation also reveals that Joe Biden’s name and inner circle were more involved with the company than has been understood: In addition to the accounts provided by former executives, investor materials described Jim Biden as an adviser to his older brother. And on top of Joe Biden’s own previously reported encounter with the firm’s CEO, at least three of Joe Biden’s relatives did work with Americore. They include Jim Biden’s wife, Sara, and his son, Jamie. The president’s son, Hunter Biden also met with its CEO, and his personal doctor — current White House physician Kevin O’Connor — joined a meeting with Jim Biden and the president of a hospital being acquired by Americore, according to a former executive and emails obtained by POLITICO.

The most damning paragraphs of Politico’s report indicate that Joe Biden’s name was a “central element” of Jim Biden’s pitch to potential partners and investors.

While the extent to which Joe Biden’s relatives have invoked their ties to him to advance their business careers has been a subject of ongoing controversy, the documents obtained by POLITICO demonstrate that Joe Biden was a central element of Jim Biden’s pitch to potential partners and investors during this period.

None of these Biden family members would answer specific questions related to Americore. The White House did not respond to detailed requests for comment.

This is relevant in the context of a “$200,000 direct payment from James and Sara Biden to Joe Biden in the form of a personal check,” released by House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) in October.

“In 2018, James Biden received $600,000 in loans from, Americore—a financially distressed and failing rural hospital operator,” press release stated. “According to bankruptcy court documents, James Biden received these loans ‘based upon representations that his last name, ‘Biden,’ could ‘open doors’ and that he could obtain a large investment from the Middle East based on his political connections’.”

“On March 1, 2018, Americore wired a $200,000 loan into James and Sara Biden’s personal bank account – not their business bank account,” the statement added. “On the same day, James Biden wrote a $200,000 check from this same personal bank account to Joe Biden.”

As reported by the Associated Press, James Biden’s lawyer has provided a now dubious defense for his client’s invocation of his brother Joe Biden in his business affairs.

“A lawyer for James Biden said at the time that there was no justification for the subpoena because the committee had already reviewed private bank records and transactions between the two brothers,” the AP reported. “The committee found records of two loans that were made when Joe Biden was not in office or a candidate for president.”

“There is nothing more to those transactions, and there is nothing wrong with them,” lawyer Paul Fishman said in a statement in November. “And Jim Biden has never involved his brother in his business dealings.”

This now appears to be patently false. Republicans are now pointing to the federal proceedings against Americore as yet more evidence of “influence peddling” by Biden’s family in their business dealings, particularly with foreign actors.

As noted by Politico’s report, James Biden heavily relied on reference to his brother, a former senator and former vice president at the time, to court Middle Eastern investors.

Jim Biden spoke of plans to give his brother equity in Americore, according to one former Americore executive, and install him on its board, according to a second. He also said that if Americore could find a winning business model for rural health care, his brother could promote the company in a future presidential campaign, a third former executive told POLITICO. All were granted anonymity to discuss a company mired in legal and political controversy

In order to fund Americore’s expansion, Jim Biden offered to secure capital from investors in the Middle East, according to the emails and executives. When the expected money did not arrive, it aggravated Americore’s preexisting financial issues. The company collapsed, leaving behind unpaid bills and neglected patients.

The human wreckage resulting from the Biden family’s exploitation of Joe Biden’s political connections for financial gain is a critical aspect of the story. Americore’s malfeasance not only lined the pockets of Biden family members, but it also devastated families that relied on the now-defunct medical provider to care for their loved ones in times of need.

Biden family corruption thus is not only a grave matter of national security, but it is also one of personal family tragedy for many Americans who were exposed to their unethical and potentially illegal activities.

NOW READ:

Harvard Economist Needed ‘Armed Guard’ After Publishing Study Finding No Racial Bias In Police Shootings

Harvard Economist Needed ‘Armed Guard’ After Publishing Study Finding No Racial Bias In Police Shootings

Harvard economics Professor Roland Fryer needed armed security with him to go out in public after he published a study finding no evidence of racial bias in officer-involved shootings, he said in an interview with The Free Press founder Bari Weiss.

Fryer, a top economist who became the youngest tenured black professor in Harvard’s history at just 30 years old, published a study in 2016 showing there was “no racial differences in officer involved-shootings.” After he published the study, “all hell broke loose,” Fryer told Weiss, noting people “lose their mind when they don’t like the result.”

“I lived under police protection for about 30 to 40 days,” he said during the interview. “I had a seven-day-old daughter at the time…I was going to the grocery store to get diapers with an armed guard.”

Fryer told Weiss he initially became interested in the topic after the shooting of Michael Brown and some other “early viral videos of police violence.” He said he was “surprised” by the result because he expected to find evidence of bias.

After the study was complete, Fryer said he hired eight additional freshmen to redo the study but came up with the same result.

“On the most extreme use of force – officer involved shootings – we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account,” Fryer’s study found.

Colleagues warned him not to publish it because it would “ruin” his career, Fryer said.

“It was posted for four minutes when I got my first email, ‘This is full of sh*t. Doesn’t make any sense,” he said, recalling the first reaction after publication.

In 2019, Fryer was placed on a two-year leave after facing allegations of sexual harassment. Claudine Gay, who was Harvard’s dean at the time, said in a letter to the economics department that he had “exhibited a pattern of behavior that failed to meet expectations of conduct within our community.”

“Do you believe in karma?” Weiss asked.

Gay resigned from her position as Harvard’s president early January after facing scrutiny over her response to antisemitism on campus and plagiarism allegations.

“I hear it’s a motherfu-ker,” Fryer responded.

NOW READ:

The Ukraine Aid Bill Could Pass the House Without Speaker Johnson’s Approval

The Ukraine Aid Bill Could Pass the House Without Speaker Johnson’s Approval

A bill that would appropriate $95 billion of taxpayer funds for foreign military aid to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan could pass the House of Representatives despite objections from the House Republican leadership.

The Senate voted on Tuesday to pass the bill, as an amendment to previous legislation passed by the House, by a vote of 70 yeas to 29 nays, despite the objections from House Speaker Mike Johnson and many Republican members of the body. Through the use of a discharge petition, a rarely employed procedural measure, a majority of the House could advance the bill to the floor and pass it.

The rules of the House, specifically Rule XV, allow members to petition to discharge a bill from consideration by committees, which require the signature of half of all members. If adopted by the House in a majority vote, it enables the petitioning member to bring up the bill expeditiously, which allows for consideration of the bill within two legislative days.

The House’s rules specify that a bill must have been pending with a committee for over 30 days before it may be discharged.

Bills do not normally advance to the House floor without the approval of the majority party’s leadership, whose positions give them significant power in the legislative process, according to CBS News.

“Speaker Johnson should put the bill on the floor one up or down vote. We’ll deal with other potential legislative options at a later date,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told the Daily Caller News Foundation on Wednesday.

Jeffries had previously vowed to use “every available legislative tool” to pass the bill, according to Politico.

Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who supports the bill, has reportedly been encouraging House members to use a discharge petition to bring the bill to the floor.

“We are not going to be forced into action by the Senate,” Johnson said at a press conference on Wednesday. “[The bill] does not have one word in the bill about America’s border.”

Discharge petitions have rarely been successful in the House due to the requirement that members of the majority party oppose their leaders.

“[D]ischarge is designed to be difficult to accomplish and has rarely been used successfully,” the Congressional Research Service wrote in 2023.

NOW READ:

Biden’s Visit to East Palestine Isn’t Going Well: ‘Let’s Go Brandon!’ Chants Break Out Upon President’s Visit

A Quick-and-Dirty Overview of Fani Willis’ and Nathan Wade’s Disastrous Court Testimony

A dramatic two-day hearing on a motion to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis came to an inconclusive end Friday.

Defense attorneys sought to prove allegations contained in Trump co-defendant Michael Roman’s Jan. 8 motion, which claimed Willis improperly benefited from awarding her romantic partner, Nathan Wade, a lucrative contract to work on the case against former president Donald Trump when he took her on vacations. Despite a witness who testified to the contrary, Willis and Wade maintained their relationship did not begin until 2022, after Wade’s contract started, and denied Willis benefited financially, claiming she paid him back for the travel expenses in cash.

Willis’ long-time friend Robin Yeartie, who formerly worked for the DA’s office, testified Thursday that the couple’s relationship began in 2019 shortly after the two met at a municipal court conference. She said she observed them hugging and kissing long before Wade’s contract began.

Terrence Bradley, Wade’s former law partner and attorney on his divorce case, also confirmed during his testimony Friday that he was emailed a draft copy of Roman’s motion before it was filed and replied to Roman’s attorney, Ashleigh Merchant, that it looked good. However, he declined to elaborate on what he meant and could not directly answer any questions about Wade’s relationship because of attorney-client privilege.

Willis’ father testified he never met Wade until 2023 and noted Willis was dating someone else, a disc jockey named “Deuce” in 2019. Yet he said he did not know about the relationship with Wade until “everyone else” did when the allegations surfaced just weeks ago.

‘I Have Money In My Home’

While Willis’ combative testimony prompted the judge at one point to call for a break and produced a number of viral lines — such as “A man is not a plan” and “Where’s Belize? What continent?” and “I like Grey Goose” — neither she nor Wade were able to provide concrete evidence backing the claim they split expenses roughly equally.

Wade’s explanation for his lack of receipts showing Willis ever reimbursed him for expenses was that she paid him in cash. Keeping lots of cash in her home was a practice her father taught her, Willis later testified, adding the cash was not withdrawn from an ATM and came from various other sources — including her first campaign.

“When you meet my father, he’s going to tell you as a woman, you should always have … at least six months in cash at your house, at all time,” Willis said.

Willis’ father, John Floyd, did on Friday back up her claim about keeping cash at the house, stating that it is a “black thing.”

The only documentation Wade could point to showing Willis covered any expenses was a receipt for an airline ticket attached to the state’s response to Roman’s motion.

After an “off the rails” first day of testifying, counsel for the district attorney’s office, Anna Cross, opted not to bring Willis back to the stand on Friday.

Conflicting Statements

Defense attorneys also questioned Wade about discrepancies in his sworn statements.

In his divorce case, he submitted a May 2023 statement claiming he never entertained or had sexual relations with another member of the opposite sex during the course of his marriage. In his affidavit responding to Roman’s allegations, he affirmed he was in a relationship with Willis starting in 2022.

Wade claimed in response that his marriage was “irretrievably broken in 2015,” even though he was still legally married. The question is worded to explicitly include the time up “to the present” along with periods “of separation.”

Wade also claimed he never used Bradley’s credit card. Bradley directly contradicted this during his testimony, stating he recalled “at least” one time where Wade used it to pay for travel.

Toward the end of the hearing Friday, Cross accused Bradley of lying about why he left the firm he previously worked at with Wade. While initially claiming the reason was covered under attorney-client privledge, he later affirmed it was due to an allegation of sexual assault.

“Mr. Bradley previously testified the reason he left the firm was totally covered by privilege,” Judge Scott McAfee said. “Now I’m left wondering if Mr. Bradley has been properly interpreting privilege this entire time.”

Next Steps

McAfee said he would schedule another hearing, potentially for next Friday. He also indicated he would privately schedule an in-camera review with Bradley to sort out his privilege claims.

Multiple legal experts indicated there may be enough evidence to demonstrate the “appearance of impropriety” even if there is not enough to show a conflict of interest.

“That’s where I’d be nervous if I were the Fulton County DA,” Georgia State University College of Law professor Anthony Michael Kreis wrote.

“I think a jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Fani Willis and Nathan Wade committed perjury at this hearing,” Atlanta-based criminal defense attorney Andrew Fleischman wrote on X. “I think it is more likely than not that the judge finds there is an appearance of impropriety here without making explicit credibility findings.”

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation

NOW READ:

Biden’s Visit to East Palestine Isn’t Going Well: ‘Let’s Go Brandon!’ Chants Break Out Upon President’s Visit

Biden’s Visit to East Palestine Isn’t Going Well: ‘Let’s Go Brandon!’ Chants Break Out Upon President’s Visit

President Joe Biden isn’t getting the ‘hometown hero’s welcome’ that he might be expecting upon finally traveling to East Palestine, Ohio, the site of site of an ecological disaster caused by a Norfolk Southern train derailment over one year ago.

Joe Biden is set to address the community in a closely stage-managed appearance on Friday.

However, the crowd expecting the presidential address do not seem to be thrilled with the belated election-year visit.

“Let’s go, Brandon!” shouted several crowd-goers, a reference to a vulgar insult that was rephrased on live air.

On Friday, the president will visit the community of 5,000 at the mayor’s request, just as the Environmental Protection Agency is about to complete a massive cleaning paid for by Norfolk Southern, the rail company. Republicans have chastised Biden for not visiting sooner, and there are ongoing tensions in the town.

“The president has always said when the time is right and when it made sense for him to go, he would go,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said. “And so, that’s what he’s doing.”

Ahead of the trip, Jean-Pierre stated in answer to a query that Biden had “no concerns about drinking the water” in the town, where chemicals and hazardous waste have spread due to the fire. She pointed out that EPA Administrator Michael Regan drank the water during a previous visit.

Biden, a Democrat, is heading into Republican country as he campaigns for reelection. Aides say it’s an opportunity for Biden to hear from the community, discuss his efforts to hold Norfolk Southern accountable, and advocate for the adoption of a rail safety law. Over the past year, several government officials have paid visits.

“It’s been a year of challenge, but a year of solidarity,” Regan said in a statement. “I’m proud of East Palestine, a community that has embodied resilience, hope and progress.”

During Biden’s visit, a separate event will be held for former President Donald Trump, the Republican front-runner. Trump received over 72% of the votes in Ohio’s Columbiana County, which contains East Palestine.

Mike Young, the rally’s coordinator, called the grassroots event “anti-Biden.” He claimed to have supplied water to the neighborhood following the catastrophe, and that the president should have arrived on the scene at once.

Donald Trump in February 2023 announced his decision to travel to East Palestine, Ohio to visit the members of the ailing community.

NOW READ:

Far Left Demonstrators in California Stage Yet Another ‘Insurrection’ to Shut Down Capitol