Home Blog Page 3

Biden Now Wants to Get Rid of All of Your Gas Appliances — Not Just Stoves

The Biden administration contends that it is not targeting gas stoves and other domestic conveniences afforded by fossil fuels, but its “building electrification” agenda is poised to effectively do just that, several energy policy experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The notion that the federal government would like to ban gas stoves is a “myth” and “misinformation,” according to the Department of Energy (DOE), which uploaded the blog post in May 2023 after Consumer Product Safety Commission Commissioner Richard Trumka Jr. suggested that a gas stove ban is “on the table” in a January 2023 Bloomberg interview. However, the administration is also working to advance its “building electrification” agenda that would bring about similar outcomes under a different name, energy policy experts told the DCNF.

“The whole ‘building electrification’ effort is part of the centralized control impulse of people who gravitate to government or stand to cash in on the latest fad, irrespective of its costs or impacts on regular Americans. It’s also part of the ‘electrify everything’ agenda of planners and masterminds,” Dan Kish, a senior research fellow for the Institute for Energy Research, told the DCNF. “The U.S. established a Constitutional Republic to limit government control, and yet control freaks want to tell us how to live by expanding the government’s reach.”

The DOE released a report in April describing all of the ways it would like to decarbonize America’s building stock in the coming decades by pushing electric vehicles, electric appliances and substantial changes to how the utility industry operates. The Biden administration has also banned the use of natural gas in new federal buildings starting in 2030 and spent considerable sums of money to help state and municipal governments craft their own ambitious green building codes.

On Thursday, the DOE announced its official definition for “zero-emissions” buildings. Two of the three minimum criteria that a building must meet to fit into the definition are that it is “free of on-site emissions from energy use” and “powered solely from clean energy.”

“The feds are outlining yet another set of ‘rules’ for decarbonization, this time focused on zero-emissions buildings,” Steve Everly, a senior managing director for FTI Consulting’s energy and natural resources practice, wrote in a post to X addressing the DOE’s Thursday announcement. “But remember there is no federal effort to ban or restrict natural gas use, so stop the culture war or something.”

OH Skinner, the executive director of the Alliance for Consumers, echoed Everly’s suggestion that “building electrification” is a backdoor to significantly changing how Americans live, including by distorting markets in ways that disadvantage consumers.

“Basically, they’re saying, ‘We’re not banning gas stoves, we’re just pushing broad housing efficiency and building code standards for health and safety that make it nearly impossible for normal consumers or businesses to access products they may want, but we’re not banning anything,’” Skinner told the DCNF. “I think a good example that applies to the spirit of the green buildings agenda is the fuel efficiency standards for vehicles. Bureaucrats say, ‘We’re not trying to ban gas powered cars, but we are going to impose efficiency standards that can only be met if the vast majority of cars sold are electric cars.’ So, in theory, you can still, right now, get a gas powered car, but they are making it so that that access is not going to be actually possible for everyday people, just an elite and ever-shrinking few.”

The administration has also issued a bevy of regulations targeting household appliances, including furnaceswater heatersdishwashers, portable gas-powered generators pool pump motors and more. In many cases, these standards are designed to push more energy efficient, and often electric or more expensive, appliances on consumers over time.

“The Biden administration doesn’t think its policies are being challenged or are unpopular, but the reality is pretty clearly the opposite,” Gabriella Hoffman, the director of the Center for Energy and Conservation at the Independent Women’s Forum (IWF), told the DCNF. “Attacking your constituents is not really a recipe for success in terms of winning over people to support your policies. And that’s why people are not supporting this administration’s regulations and electrification push. That’s why people don’t want to be dictated choices, especially with personal decisions like what type of stove you use, what car you drive, your gas furnace and so on.”

IWF has kept track of the administration’s appliance rules and estimated that the total costs of upgrading a home to align with the administration’s regulations are in the thousands of dollars. These expenses may not be especially onerous for the well-to-do, but they figure to weigh heavily on average Americans already feeling inflation’s pinch, Hoffman told the DCNF.

The DOE did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation

NOW READ:

‘It’s Terrifying’: Ex-FBI Director Says Bureau Officials May Flee Country if Trump Re-Elected

Pro-Palestinian Protesters Go on Statue-Vandalizing Rampage, Hundreds Go Unprosecuted

Pro-Palestinian protesters vandalized statues and threw items at a National Park Service ranger near the White House during a Saturday protest calling for a cease-fire in the war between Israel and Hamas, according to multiple videos.

“Surround the White House for Gaza” was held Saturday afternoon and deemed a “national mobilization” to call for an “immediate ceasefire, an immediate end to the siege on Gaza, the freedom of all Palestinian prisoners, and an end to the occupation of Palestine,” according to a description of the event.

Videos posted on social media appeared to show protesters vandalized statues, harassed a National Park Service ranger and set off smoke bombs.

Attendees at the protest also shouted anti-Israel slogans, including “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” according to a video feed from Fox 5 Washington D.C.

Israeli forces rescued four hostages from Gaza on Saturday, the IDF announced. Noa Argamani, 25, Almog Meir Jan, 21, Andrey Kozlov, 27 and Shlomi Ziv, 40, were freed during raids on two locations in Nuseirat.

“Israeli special forces conducted a complex hostage rescue mission and successfully rescued four of our hostages from Hamas,” IDF spokesman RAdm. Daniel Hagari said in a video. “They are back home in Israel. They are alive, they are well.”

One speaker at the rally called the Israeli rescue a “massacre,” according to the Fox 5 video.

President Biden is in France for the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy, as well as a state dinner.

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation

NOW READ:

‘It’s Terrifying’: Ex-FBI Director Says Bureau Officials May Flee Country if Trump Re-Elected

‘It’s Terrifying’: Ex-FBI Director Says Bureau Officials May Flee Country if Trump Re-Elected

Former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe has stated that high-ranking FBI officials intend to flee the nation if former President Donald Trump is re-elected in November.

McCabe, who now works as an analyst for CNN, told network host Kaitlan Collins that intelligence community members are concerned they will be prosecuted for their involvement in numerous hoaxes, including the “Russian collusion” lie and the bogus letter that falsely labeled Hunter Biden’s laptop as “Russian disinformation” just before the 2020 election.

“I worry a lot about it, and I think when you think about these things and you try to predict how Donald Trump is going to react or the steps he’s going to take, you really don’t have to go any further than listening to the things he says and does mean,” he said.

“His comments recently are offensive and horrendous, but they’re not surprising in any way. He’s been saying this for quite some time. ‘I will be your retribution’ is is refrain to his supporters. So you know him, you know what motivates him. He is not a person who’s driven by principal or ideology. He is someone who’s entirely transactional. And if he feels like he’s been wronged in some way, then he focuses on revenge and in vengeance.”

“And so he’s made it perfectly clear that that’s what he’s going to do. And in the process of seeking that, he — runs the risk of really dismantling and greatly incapacitating the Department of Justice and the FBI,” he added. “And that is something that Americans on both sides of the political aisle should be worried about. We depend on those institutions to protect us.”

“Well, what do you think he is proposing to tear down? What do people inside the FBI think when they hear a comment like that?” Collins asked after giving the former FBI official a platform to disseminate his political views without a whiff of pushback.

“It is terrifying. It’s frightening,” McCabe claimed. “I have a lot of conversations with former colleagues, people who are or were in the intelligence in law enforcement community and may have worked in the Obama administration other places. And people are really trying to assess what is life going to be like if Donald Trump wins a second term.”

“And on a very personal level, I mean, these are torturous discussions with their family members about whether or not they have to leave the country to avoid being unconstitutionally and illegally detained,” he added. “I mean, people are actually worried about being thrown in jail or grabbed in some sort of extra judicial detention. And I think as crazy as this sounds in the United States of America, I think people should really consider that these are possibilities. Listen to what the man says. He typically does what he says, as crazy as it seems. And that’s really all the indicators you need.”

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has locked up thousands of peaceful Trump supporters and has politically persecuted them throughout the Biden administration.

Newly Revealed Bank Records Show the Biden Family Sold America Out to Foreign Interests

Newly revealed bank records subpoenaed from the First Family’s personal and business financial accounts show how Biden family members sold America out to foreign interests.

The House Oversight Committee provided the bank record summaries to the public along with criminal referrals for both Hunter Biden and James Biden, who are related to sitting President Joe Biden.

“The subpoenaed bank records revealed that from 2014 to 2023, Hunter Biden, James Biden, their associated companies, and certain other Biden family members received over $18 million from foreign sources,” the committee’s report stated. “Additionally, the bank records established that when Biden business associates and their companies are included, over $27 million was received from foreign sources during the same time period.

“The Bidens, their business associates, and their related companies received funds from individuals and entities associated with Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, China, Romania, Panama, and other locations,” the report continued.

“These figures do not include the approximately $8 million in loans Hunter Biden
and James Biden received from Democratic benefactors such as Kevin Morris, Joey Langston, and John Hynansky,” the report added. “The amount of money Hunter Biden, James Biden, and even Joe Biden sourced from foreign and domestic companies and then later described as a ‘loan,’ often without documentation to show the terms of the loan and much of which was never repaid, is alarming.”

“In total, since 2014, the Committees have accounted for over $35 million received by Biden family members, their companies, and business associates, which includes financial transactions described as ‘loans’,” the report noted. “Despite much effort, the Committees have not identified legitimate services warranting such lucrative payments.”

The House Oversight Committee summarized the subpoenaed bank records of foreign payments to certain Biden family members and their business entities:

  • Russia: $3,500,000 (Yelena Baturina to Rosemont Seneca Thornton)
  • Ukraine: $3,986,869.53 (Numerous Burisma Holdings Ltd. transactions to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, Owasco P.C.)
  • Kazakhstan: $142,300 (Novatus Holdings to Rosemont Seneca Bohai)
  • China: $7,283,188.76 (Numerous transactions through intermediary companies to Biden family members)
  • Romania: $1,038,627.08 (Bladon Enterprises Ltd. to Biden family members)
  • Panama: $1,040,000.00 (Stanhope Worldwide Services, Briest Trading International Company to James Biden)
  • Other Global Investments: $1,031,572.16 to Biden family members

It should be noted that Biden family members did not sell anything concrete to these foreign interests beyond access to the former vice president and current president.

The committee provided a general overview of the Biden family’s foreign influence peddling scheme.

“The Oversight Committee’s investigation revealed a pattern in which Hunter Biden would use a business associate’s corporate bank account (an intermediary account) to receive millions of dollars in foreign funds,” the report stated. “For instance, Hunter Biden used Devon Archer’s limited liability company (LLC), Rosemont Seneca Bohai, LLC (Rosemont Seneca Bohai), and Rob Walker’s LLC, Robinson Walker, LLC, to receive money from foreign companies and individuals. Devon Archer and Rob Walker were business associates of Hunter Biden. After the business associates’ LLCs received the foreign wires, the business associates would transfer Hunter Biden, his companies, and other Biden family members significant payments.”

The House Oversight Committee then accused both James Biden and Hunter Biden of lying to Congress. Congressman James Comer (R-KY), Chairman of the Oversight Committee, promised that the efforts to hold the Bidens accountable was “only the beginning.”

“Our investigation has revealed President Biden knew about, participated in, and benefitted from his family cashing in on the Biden name around the world. Despite this record of evidence, President Biden continues to lie to the American people about his involvement in these influence peddling schemes. It appears making false statements runs in the Biden family. We’ve caught President Biden’s son and brother making blatant lies to Congress in what appears to be a concerted effort to hide Joe Biden’s involvement in his family’s schemes. As part of our efforts to hold the Bidens accountable for profiting off public office, we are today referring Hunter and James Biden to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution for making false statements to Congress. This is not the end of our efforts to hold the Bidens accountable; it’s only the beginning,” said Chairman Comer.

Here is the committee’s summary of false statements allegedly made by Hunter and James Biden:

  • During his deposition, Hunter Biden made false statements about holding a position at Rosemont Seneca Bohai (RSB)
  • Hunter Biden lied about threatening a Chinese business partner while invoking his father’s presence. Hunter Biden testified he transmitted this threat to an unrelated individual. However, Hunter Biden made this threat to the intended individual, and bank records prove it. The Chinese business partners wired millions of dollars to his company after his threat. A portion of the proceeds were traced to Joe Biden’s bank account.
  • During James Biden’s transcribed interview, he stated that Joe Biden did not meet with Tony Bobulinski in 2017 while pursuing a deal with CEFC China Energy. His statements were contradicted not only by Bobulinski, but Hunter Biden. Bobulinski also produced text messages that establish the events leading up to and immediately following his meeting with Joe Biden on May 2, 2017.

“Lying to Congress is a serious crime with serious consequences. Both Hunter and James Biden did just that,” said Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH). “They lied to coverup President Biden’s involvement in their family’s international influence peddling schemes that have generated millions of dollars. These criminal referrals are a reflection of criminal wrongdoing by the Biden family, and the Department of Justice must take steps to hold the Bidens accountable.”

NOW READ:

Biden’s Inner Circle is Complicit in Foreign Influence Peddling: Politico

Biden’s Inner Circle is Complicit in Foreign Influence Peddling: Politico

Politico has published a devastating exposé that reveals in detail that President Joe Biden’s inner circle has been complicit in his family’s foreign influence peddling.

The Politico report is a damaging rejoinder to staunch Democrats who deny that President Joe Biden and his aide had knowledge of or participation in the Biden family’s foreign influence schemes.

Ben Shreckinger, who authored the story, addresses the Biden administration’s denials of complicity in the illicit business schemes head on:

For years, Joe Biden shared a bookkeeper with his son, Hunter. He also shared a personal lawyer with his brother, Jim. And when Jim Biden wanted to know more about one of Hunter Biden’s associates, he hired the former head of Joe Biden’s Secret Service detail to investigate.

Since 2019, Joe Biden has repeatedly distanced himself from his family’s business dealings, saying that he has never so much as discussed them with his relatives or with anyone else. But House impeachment inquiry interviews, public records and emails reviewed by POLITICO show that members of his inner circle were regularly enmeshed in those dealings: Many of the president’s closest staffers and advisers have doubled as his relatives’ business associates, both during and after their stints working for the man at the center of the Biden family orbit.

Those overlaps reflect an all-in-the family approach to business and politicking that dates back a half-century to the president’s first Senate bid, run primarily by his parents and siblings. Since then, his political patrons have at times forged business ties with his relatives, who in turn have converted some of their business partners into campaign supporters. And over a lifetime in public life, some of the president’s aides have taken on roles as surrogate members of the tight-knit Biden clan.

The Bidens’ approach complicates their efforts to distance the president from his family’s ventures.

That is an understatement. The report names Biden assistants who functioned as go-betweens between Joe Biden, James Biden, and Hunter Biden.

These go-betweens include Eric Schwerin, who was Joe Biden’s personal bookkeeper and Hunter Biden’s business partner; Mel Monzack, who was a personal attorney for both Joe and Jim Biden; Fran Person, who was Joe Biden’s body man, sought to engage Hunter Biden in Chinese real estate business ventures; White House physician Kevin O’Connor, who was also Joe Biden’s doctor as vice president, and pursued a potential health care deal alongside Jim Biden in 2017; and Dale Pupillo, who oversaw Joe Biden’s Secret Service detail during his vice presidency, and then worked as a private investigator for Jim Biden.

The House Oversight Committee on Wednesday referred both James Biden and Hunter Biden for criminal prosecution for  making false statements to Congress about key aspects of the impeachment inquiry of President Joe Biden.

“These false statements implicate Joe Biden’s knowledge of and role in his family’s influence peddling schemes and appear to be a calculated effort to shield Joe Biden from the impeachment inquiry,” the Oversight Committee stated.

NOW READ:

Bill Maher Slams Biden’s ‘Bizarre Scheme’ to Fool Americans on Illegal Immigration

There is Almost Zero Historic Precedent for What Biden’s DOJ Just Did to Steve Bannon

There’s almost no historical precedent for the Biden Department of Justice’s (DOJ) effort to have Steve Bannon serve time in jail for his conviction on contempt of Congress charges.

After an appeals court upheld in May Bannon’s conviction on contempt of Congress charges for ignoring a Jan. 6 select committee subpoena, the DOJ asked the district court judge who initially issued Bannon’s four-month prison sentence to order him to report to prison. Judge Carl J. Nichols agreed Thursday, ending the hold on his nearly unprecedented sentence that had been in place during his appeal.

Bannon now must report to prison by July 1. Besides former President Donald Trump aide Peter Navarro, who is currently serving a four-month sentence for contempt of Congress, one of the most recent historical precedents for such a sentence dates to the Cold War, when a group of writers, directors and producers known as the “Hollywood Ten” were sentenced to jail time for refusing to cooperate with the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), according to the Washington Post.

The ten believed questions posed by the HUAC violated their First Amendment rights, but the House voted to hold them in contempt in November 1947 for refusing to state whether they were members of the Communist Party, according to Politico.

Former Richard Nixon aide G. Gordon Liddy and former Nixon Attorney General Richard Kleindienst pleaded guilty to contempt of Congress charges but did not go to jail, according to the Washington Post

“While there is a fair amount of precedent for lying to Congress, there is far less for people convicted of contempt of Congress,” John Malcolm, vice president for the Heritage Foundation’s Institute for Constitutional Government and former deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s Criminal Division, told the Daily Caller News Foundation in January.

Navarro, former trade advisor to Trump, was ordered to report to a Miami prison on March 19, where he began his four-month sentence. After Navarro was indicted in June 2022, the FBI arrested him at Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C., when he was heading to a Nashville speaking engagement, according to Politico.

Hunter Biden, who defied a congressional subpoena in December, choosing to hold a press conference on Capitol Hill rather than sit for his deposition, has not yet been found in contempt of Congress.

Criminal defense attorney and legal analyst Philip Holloway told the Daily Caller News Foundation in December that the law “must be applied equally or it has no meaning,” arguing Hunter Biden should “be held to the same standard” as Bannon.

The House Judiciary Committee and House Oversight Committee voted in May to advance resolutions to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for defying their request to turn over audio recordings from special counsel Robert Hur’s interview with President Joe Biden.

After the House voted to cite former President Barack Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress in 2012, Holder faced no jail time, as the DOJ did not initiate criminal prosecution.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said at the time that it is “an established principle, dating back to the administration of President Ronald Reagan, that the Justice Department does not pursue prosecution in a contempt case when the president has asserted executive privilege,” according to CNN.

“We have had constitutional executive privilege for 250 years–going back to George Washington–so the President of the United States can receive candid, confidential advice from his advisors without fear their advice will get publicly aired before courts or Congress,” Mike Davis, founder and president of the Article III Project, wrote Thursday on X. “President Biden and his Attorney General Merrick Garland have shamefully destroyed this, in their partisan quest to politicize and weaponize the Biden Justice Department to go after President Trump and his top aides.”

Bannon said Thursday outside the courthouse that there is “not a prison built or jail built that will ever shut me up.”

“They’re not going to shut up Trump, they’re not going to shut up Navarro, they’re not going to shut up Bannon, and they’re certainly not going to shut up MAGA,” Bannon said. “There is nothing that can shut me up and there is nothing that will shut me up.”

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation

NOW READ:

Bill Maher Slams Biden’s ‘Bizarre Scheme’ to Fool Americans on Illegal Immigration

Bill Maher Slams Biden’s ‘Bizarre Scheme’ to Fool Americans on Illegal Immigration

Comedian Bill Maher said on Friday  that President Joe Biden’s newly unveiled immigration executive order is an attempt to boost his reelection chances that is doomed to fail.

Biden unveiled the order Tuesday following months of asserting there was no action he could take to mitigate the crisis, with the executive action halting new asylum requests once the number of migrants crossing into the U.S. reaches a daily average of 2,500 over the span of a week. Maher said on “Real Time with Bill Maher” the immigration issue is a key barrier to Biden’s reelection, but that the executive order will not satisfy anybody.

“I think if Biden loses this election, it’s gonna be because of two things,” Maher said. “He’s old and he can’t get past that issue and people just hate that about him. And immigration. I mean, just on a political level, I don’t think they could’ve handled it worse. Because now what’s going on … he’s finally, after saying he couldn’t do anything, he’s gonna issue an executive order. By the way, this is the same executive order Trump tried to get through the courts and they didn’t let him do it.”

“But he’s gonna finally try it six months before the election, which says we’ll put a cap of 2,500 now asylum seekers coming in,” the comedian continued. “If it passes 2,500, if it’s 2,501 then we automatically close the border. Fire marshal says, ‘No more.’ He’s gonna come here and close the club. And if you don’t have a stamp on your hand, you can’t get back in.”

There have been at least six million southern border encounters during Biden’s presidency. Biden faced criticism from both sides of the aisle after announcing the executive order.

“But when it goes down to 1,500, then we resume standard asylum procedures. It’s like surge pricing with Uber,” Maher joked. “It’s a bizarre scheme that of course has pleased nobody. It looks like he did nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing. Of course, he did try through Congress and the Republicans purposely spiked that football … but now it looks like this is his last minute before the election Hail Mary pass. And it’s not going to succeed.”

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation

NOW READ:

Surgeon Indicted for Blowing Whistle On Child Sex Changes Says He ‘Will Not Be Silenced’

MSNBC Contributor Calls for Military to Take Stand Against Trump in Unhinged Rant

MSNBC analyst Donny Deutsch on Friday urged the military to release an ad campaign against former President Donald Trump ahead of the upcoming presidential election.

Trump is beating President Joe Biden in the five crucial swing states of Nevada, Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, according to a May New York Times/Siena College surveyDeutsch suggested on “Morning Joe” that if former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, former Secretary of Defense James Mattis, former National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley release an ad campaign, it could help turn voters against Trump.

“Contrast is everything in this election,” Deutsch said. “And I think the military is the greatest example to show the contrast between two men. You see Donald Trump who, you know, got off, didn’t serve because of bunions and allegedly told John Kelly, his chief of staff … as they were in a cemetery looking at fallen heroes, ‘why would any person be a sucker and give their life for their country?’ And that’s all you need to know about Donald Trump.”

The Atlantic published a story in September 2020 citing anonymous sources claiming Trump canceled a 2018 visit to a cemetery in France where American troops are buried, saying that they were “suckers” and “losers,” but the credibility of the story has come under question. Former national security adviser John Bolton denied Trump made these remarks and said he did not visit because of weather and security reasons.

“I think the most compelling advertising campaign would be centered around the military,” he continued. “If we got Mattis, McMaster, Milley and Kelly, to go to screen and say, ‘look this country cannot stand Donald Trump. The defense of this country will not stand Donald Trump. We are great Americans. We believe in the country. We trust this country. We know this country. You can’t vote for Donald Trump.’ I think the military is the secret weapon in this election and I hope those ads come to fruition.”

NOW READ:

Trump Ties With Biden In Longtime Blue State A Week After Bragg Guilty Verdict, Poll Shows

Surgeon Indicted for Blowing Whistle On Child Sex Changes Says He ‘Will Not Be Silenced’

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently indicted Texas surgeon Dr. Eithan Haim, who blew the whistle on a children’s hospital performing sex change procedures on minors. Haim told the Daily Caller News Foundation he will not be intimidated or silenced, vowing to fight the allegations in court.

In 2023, Haim discovered Texas Children’s Hospital was performing pediatric sex change procedures despite hospital administrators previously telling the public that their child gender program had been shut down. Haim provided documentation of the procedures to journalist Christopher Rufo, who published a May 2023 story in City Journal and on Substack exposing Texas Children’s Hospital. Shortly after the story was published, the Texas Legislature passed a bill banning pediatric sex change procedures statewide.

However, in June 2023, federal agents arrived at Haim’s home, notifying him of he may be the subject of a potential criminal investigation related to the published whistleblower documents, according to his fundraising page. The Biden DOJ was investigating Haim for alleged violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), a federal law that protects individually identifiable health information, such as a patient’s name. 

Haim has long maintained that the documents he provided Rufo did not include any such information. Rufo, who first reported Haim’s indictment in City Journal, wrote that he “can confirm that nothing in the information provided to me identified any individual; all the documents were, in fact, carefully redacted.”

Threats of prosecution materialized this week when U.S. marshals appeared at Haim’s home and summoned him to appear in court Monday. Haim is charged with four felony counts of violating HIPPA, according to City Journal.

Haim told the Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview that he is not intimidated by the indictment.

“The most important thing is that, at this point, its game time,” Haim said. “We’re entering the arena, we have to fight back. I’m not going to be silenced, I’m not going to be intimidated. The most likely chance we have of winning, is to win this in court.”

On January 24, 2024, Haim’s legal team sent a letter to Republican Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio and Chip Roy of Texas refuting the legitimacy of the claims made against Haim by federal prosecutor Tina Ansari.

The letter asserts the prosecution’s investigation was based on the “easily disproved falsehood” that the documents Haim provided contained children’s names.

“Yet it is obvious from a quick glance that all patient information is redacted,” Haim’s lawyers wrote. “Thus, either someone intentionally misrepresented this critical fact, or the investigation proceeded without anyone verifying the most basic facts about what happened.”

Haim estimates it will cost at least $500,000 to fight the charges in court.

“What that requires is at least $500,000 to pursue this federal trial with our attorneys,” Haim said.

His fundraising page shows he’s currently raised just over $310,000.

“Dr. Haim blew the whistle against a hospital that proclaimed it had stopped performing gender-changing surgeries and treatments on minors, when, in fact, it had not,” Haim’s lawyer Mark Lytle told the DCNF. “These surgeries are a violation of Texas law. Dr. Haim was brave in coming forward. Now the federal government is coming after him. He will strongly defend himself at trial and we expect he will be found not guilty.”

Haim maintains medical providers should be able to openly talk about procedures happening at their institutions, a sentiment core to his story.

“There’s nothing a doctor should do behind closed doors that they’re unwilling to defend in public,” Haim told the DCNF.  “That’s never how medicine should be, especially when it involves children.”

The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation

NOW READ:

Trump Ties With Biden In Longtime Blue State A Week After Bragg Guilty Verdict, Poll Shows

Trump Ties With Biden In Longtime Blue State A Week After Bragg Guilty Verdict, Poll Shows

Former President Donald Trump leads President Joe Biden in Virginia just one week after he was convicted, a new poll reveals.

Last week, Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the case brought forth by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. Despite this, Trump maintains his lead in FloridaArizona and Nevada, and ties with Biden with 48% in historically blue Virginia, according to a recent Fox News poll that surveyed voters following Trump’s conviction on May 31.

The last time Virginia voted for a Republican presidential candidate was for former President George W. Bush in 2004. Trump lost in Virginia in 2016 and in 2020 against former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and Biden respectively.

Following his guilty verdict, Trump’s campaign donation page crashed within minutes of reaching the guilty verdict. Within a day, the Trump campaign announced a record breaking $34.8 million from small dollar donors. Along with his record breaking cash flow, Trump managed to maintain his lead in crucial states.

In Florida, Trump is leading Biden in a two-way race by four points, polling at 50.6% while Biden trails behind at 42%, according to a RealClear Polling (RCP) average. In a five-way race with Green Party candidate Jill Stein and independent candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Cornel West, Trump’s lead grows to 10 points at 48% while Biden polls at 37.5%.

Trump won Florida in both 2016 and 2020, but by a slim margin. In 2016, Trump won the sunshine state by a little over 1%, and in 2020 he kept the state red by a little over 3.3%. His lead in the upcoming election gives Trump a slightly larger advantage.

Trump continues polling ahead of Biden by roughly four points in Arizona, leading with 48.3% compared to Biden at 44.1%, the RCP average shows. In a five-way race, Trump has a roughly five point advantage with 43.8% and Biden at 38.2%, marking a significant advantage for the former president compared to Biden’s razor thin margin in the 2020 election.

In 2016, Trump narrowly won Arizona but lost Nevada to Clinton. In the following 2020 cycle, Trump lost both Arizona and Nevada to Biden. Going into 2024, Trump’s leads.

Trump is also ahead of Biden by roughly five points in Nevada, where he is polling at 48.3% while Biden polls at 43%, according to RCP. In 2020, Biden won Nevada by less than three percentage points, while Trump has consistently led the state in 2024. Taking into account third-party candidates, Trump maintains a 6 point lead at 42.5% with Biden at 35.7%.

The Fox Virginia poll surveyed 1,107 registered voters and had a three point margin of error.

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation

NOW READ:

Trump’s ‘Guilty’ Verdict Now in Danger of Being Overturned Due to ‘Mistrial’